Anthropic Sonnet Model

Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 is Anthropic's most agentic Sonnet model yet, built for coding, tool use, browser work, computer use, and cost-efficient autonomous agents.

Jun 30, 2026
official release date
$2 / $10
intro input / output per 1M tokens
84.7%
BrowseComp at 10M token limit
Capabilities

What Claude Sonnet 5 Improves

Anthropic positions Claude Sonnet 5 as a lower-cost Sonnet model that narrows the gap with Opus 4.8 on agentic work while improving over Sonnet 4.6 across coding, tools, and knowledge tasks.

Agentic Planning And Tool Use

Sonnet 5 can make plans, use browsers and terminals, and run autonomously at a level that previously required larger and more expensive models.

Coding And Terminal Workflows

The system card reports 63.2 on SWE-Bench Pro, 80.4 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, and 38.8 on FrontierCode v1 for Claude Sonnet 5.

Search And Computer Use

Anthropic reports 84.7 on BrowseComp with a 10M token limit and 81.2 on OSWorld-Verified, both important signals for browser and desktop-style agents.

Cost-Performance Control

Users can adjust effort levels to trade off cost and capability, with Sonnet 5 covering a wider range of cost-performance options than Sonnet 4.6.

Safer Agentic Behavior

Anthropic says Sonnet 5 has a lower overall rate of undesirable behaviors than Sonnet 4.6 and better resistance to prompt injection in agentic contexts.

Cyber Safeguards By Default

Sonnet 5 launches with cyber safeguards enabled by default and remains much less capable than Opus 4.8 and Mythos 5 on dangerous cyber evaluations.

Claude Sonnet 5 Benchmarks

Official Capability Summary Across Coding And Agent Tasks

The official system card summary reports Sonnet 5 gains over Sonnet 4.6 on SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench, BrowseComp, Humanity's Last Exam, OSWorld-Verified, FrontierCode, and GDPval-AA v2.

Scores are from Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 5 System Card. BrowseComp shows single-agent and multi-agent scores. Standard Sonnet 5 results use adaptive thinking at max effort unless Anthropic notes otherwise.

Local recreation of the official Claude Sonnet 5 capability evaluation summary table
BrowseComp Cost Performance

Claude Sonnet 5 Scales Strongly On Agentic Search

On BrowseComp, Anthropic reports Sonnet 5 moving from 79.3 at a 1M token limit to 84.7 at a 10M token limit, while Sonnet 4.6 remains lower across the same limits.

Anthropic's launch post says the updated BrowseComp chart uses its standard methodology with a 10M token budget, context compaction, and programmatic tool calling.

Official Anthropic BrowseComp test-time compute scaling chart for Claude Sonnet 5
Computer Use

Claude Sonnet 5 Reaches 81.2% On OSWorld-Verified

OSWorld-Verified measures real computer tasks in a live Ubuntu VM. Anthropic reports 81.2 for Sonnet 5, ahead of Sonnet 4.6 and close to Opus 4.8.

Anthropic notes OSWorld-Verified scores were run with updated evaluation settings that better reflect real-world performance.

Official Anthropic OSWorld-Verified benchmark chart for Claude Sonnet 5
Agentic Coding

FrontierCode Shows A Large Step Up From Sonnet 4.6

The FrontierCode v1 chart compares score against average cost per task across effort levels. Sonnet 5 reaches 38.8 at max effort versus 15.1 for Sonnet 4.6 in the summary table.

The chart recomputes costs at API list rates and shows effort levels from low through max. Sonnet 5 remains below Fable 5 but materially improves on Sonnet 4.6.

Official Anthropic FrontierCode v1 cost-performance chart for Claude Sonnet 5
Safety Evaluations

Automated Behavioral Audit Improves Over Sonnet 4.6 Overall

Anthropic reports that lower scores are better in its automated behavioral audit. Sonnet 5 improves over Sonnet 4.6 overall, while Opus 4.8 and Mythos Preview remain lower on some categories.

This official chart covers misaligned behavior, constitutional misalignment, and Claude Code sandbox behavior. Anthropic discusses a broader set of audit categories in Section 6.4 of the system card.

Official Anthropic automated behavioral audit chart for Claude Sonnet 5
Cyber Capability

Firefox 147 Shows Low Dangerous Cyber Capability For Sonnet 5

In Anthropic's Firefox 147 exploit-development evaluation, Sonnet 5 had 0.0% working-exploit success and 13.2% any-success, far below Opus 4.8 and Mythos 5.

Anthropic says the Firefox 147 vulnerabilities were patched in Firefox 148 and that both Sonnet models had 0.0% working-exploit success.

Official Anthropic Firefox 147 exploit development chart for Claude Sonnet 5
Availability And Pricing

Claude Sonnet 5 Cost And API Access

Claude Sonnet 5 launched everywhere on June 30, 2026, with introductory pricing through August 31, 2026, followed by standard Sonnet 5 pricing.

Intro Input
$2 / 1M tokens
Intro Output
$10 / 1M tokens
Standard Input
$3 / 1M tokens
Standard Output
$15 / 1M tokens

Introductory pricing runs through August 31, 2026. Anthropic notes Sonnet 5 uses an updated tokenizer, so the same input can map to roughly 1.0 to 1.35 times as many tokens depending on content type.

Model Comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs. Sonnet 4.6 vs. Opus 4.8

Anthropic frames Sonnet 5 as a strict improvement over Sonnet 4.6 and a lower-cost model that can approach Opus 4.8 on selected agentic tasks at higher effort levels.

FeatureClaude Sonnet 5Claude Sonnet 4.6Claude Opus 4.8
Release RoleMost agentic Sonnet model yet, designed to narrow the gap with Opus-class agentic capability.Previous best Sonnet model used as the main baseline in Anthropic's launch materials.More generally capable Opus-class model used as the higher-capability reference.
API Pricing$2 input / $10 output per 1M tokens through August 31, 2026, then $3 / $15.Lower capability predecessor; current pricing should be checked in Anthropic's platform docs.$5 input / $25 output per 1M tokens in Anthropic's launch-post comparison.
SWE-Bench Pro63.258.1Not listed in the capability summary table.
Terminal-Bench 2.180.467.0Compared in cost-performance charts; summary table compares GPT-5.5 and Gemini 3.5 Flash instead.
BrowseComp84.7 single agent and 86.6 multi agent in the summary table.76.2Cost-performance chart shows strong performance, with Sonnet 5 offering lower-cost options.
OSWorld-Verified81.278.583.4 in the OSWorld chart.
Cybersecurity RiskCyber safeguards enabled by default; lower dangerous cyber capability than current Opus models.0.0% working-exploit success on Firefox 147, with lower partial success than Sonnet 5.Stronger cyber capability than Sonnet 5 and recommended by Anthropic for cybersecurity work requiring reduced guardrails.

The supplied keyword phrase mentions Claude Sonnet 5 vs Opus 4.6; Anthropic's official launch materials compare Sonnet 5 primarily with Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.8.

Use Claude Sonnet 5 With Focused Agent Skills

Start Claude Sonnet 5 inside a hosted MyClaw agent, then add task-specific skills for SEO, research, content, and operational workflows instead of prompting everything from scratch.

Similar Models

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 With Other Agent Models

Use these pages to compare Claude Sonnet 5 against frontier reasoning, coding, and long-context models available in the MyClaw model directory.

Claude Sonnet 5 FAQ

Model Directory

Evaluate Claude Sonnet 5 Alongside Other Agent-Ready Models

Use MyClaw to compare models in practical hosted workflows with tools, files, browser access, and managed runtime.

Run Sonnet 5 in MyClaw